1841: Jonathan Nixon Conard to Hon. Francis James

Jonathan N. Conard

Jonathan N. Conard

This letter was written by Jonathan Nixon Conard (1800-1861) who resided in Warminster, Bucks County, Pennsylvania in the 1840s. He was married to Rebecca Iredell (1798-1869).

Conard wrote the letter to his Congressmen acquaintance, Frances James (1799-1886) who was then serving in the Twenty-seventh Congress. Congressman James was born in Chester County, Pennsylvania, where he attended the public schools and Gauses’ Academy; studied law; was admitted to the bar of Chester County in 1825 and commenced practice in West Chester, Pa.; member of the State senate 1834-1836; elected as an Anti-Masonic candidate to the Twenty-sixth Congress and reelected as a Whig to the Twenty-seventh Congress (March 4, 1839-March 3, 1843); chairman, Committee on Revisal and Unfinished Business (Twenty-seventh Congress); resumed the practice of his profession in West Chester, Chester County, Pa.

1841 Letter

1841 Letter

TRANSCRIPTION
Addressed to Hon. Francis James, Member of Congress, Washington D.C.

Mechanicsville P. O., Bucks County, Pennsylvania
February 4th 1841

Francis James, Esqr.
Dear Sir,

In my letter to you written about the first of May last stating the changes that were taking place in Bucks in favor of Gen. Harrison, I presume you supposed me to be too sanguine, as your letter dated “May 12th 1840” puts this interrogatory, “Cannot you send some good opposition man in place of J. Davis?” ¹ — To which I am now able to say yes, sir, and that too with the greatest pleasure imaginable, not only on account of the triumph of sound Democratic principles in Bucks, but also, because I am, and have been from my boyhood a warm, personal friend of Mr. [Robert] Ramsey.

You are aware that if Bucks had not “come out from among the foul party,” Pennsylvania would have been left to Gen’l. Harrison and returned “plow tail” Davis to Congress, which of itself would be sufficiently degrading to the County and State. Because I consider Davis a political gambler who is willing to be a noisy instrument for any party, or for any man who will administer to his ambition a crumb of the spoils occasionally, and I told him so. You will learn ‘ere this reaches you that our Masonic Governor ² has used his veto against a Democratic measure that he has refused to send on the “Resolutions of Instruction” and that he has pardoned the vilest of he vile. We have the most anti-Republican Governor that ever ruled this state.

Very respectfully, — Jonathan Conard

P. S. A rupture has just taken place among the Locos here in regard to the election of delegates to the 4th of March Convention. The “Executive Committee” have advertised for a meeting to be held on a certain day to elect delegates who, it is surmised, are to oppose the re-nomination of Judge [John] Fox ³ and about 80 individuals have called a county meeting of the party to elect delegates also, but it is believed that are to be favorable to Fox. Bet these surmises correct or otherwise there is trouble in their camp, I assure you, and I hope it may result in good for the people at large. I think from present appearances that the delegates on the part of the Whigs here will go for Judge [John] Banks, but as I am not a politician, I may be mistaken. I think it likely that he will be the most available candidate you can have at present, provided he is not a Free Mason. — J. C.

¹ John Davis (1788-1878) resided in Davisville, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. He was a Democrat, served in the U.S. Army during the War of 1812, and served as a U.S. Representative from Pennsylvania’s 6th District 1839-1841. Davis was unsuccessful for his re-election bid to Congress in 1840. President Polk later appointed him “surveyor of the port” of Philadelphia, however. Conard derogatorily referred to Davis as a “plow tail” — a mule’s ass — who would be willing “to be a noisy instrument for any party.”

² David Rittenhouse Porter (1788-1867) was the ninth Governor of Pennsylvania, serving from 1839-1845. Conrad’s strongly anti-masonic stance caused him to label Porter “the most anti-Republican Governor that ever ruled this state.”

³ John Fox, as president judge of the Judicial District Composed of the counties of Bucks and Montgomery, took a stance against the exercise of Negro Suffrage in Pennsylvania and moved to insert the word “white” as one of the proposed amendments to the constitution. 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: